Saturday, February 2, 2013

What does the Bible say about sex and healthy relationships?


Earlier this week I was pulling together ideas for the next question when this post ran across my easily-distracted attention span:

I am damaged goods. by Sarah Bessey

Here’s how she led off:
I was nineteen years old and crazy in love with Jesus when that preacher told an auditorium I was “damaged goods” because of my sexual past. He was making every effort to encourage this crowd of young adults to “stay pure for marriage.” He was passionate, yes, well-intentioned, and he was a good speaker, very convincing indeed….
Oh, he didn’t call me up to the front and name me. But he stood up there and talked about me with such disgust, like I couldn't be in that real-life crowd of young people worshipping in that church. I felt spotlighted and singled out amongst the holy, surely my red face announced my guilt to every one.

She goes on to say:
In the face of our sexually-dysfunctional culture, the Church longs to stand as an outpost of God’s ways of love and marriage, purity and wholeness.
And yet we twist that until we treat someone like me – and, according to this research, 80% of you are like me – as if our value and worth was tied up in our virginity.

My first thought was this isn't how Jesus would have done it. True, Jesus didn't let the Samaritan woman at the well hide from the fact that she had 5 previous husbands and was living with someone else (John 4). But Jesus didn't shame her or lecture her on purity laws. He saw her as a human being, in need of love and nurturing, not scolding. He offered her spiritual nourishment. She left the well filled with a new spirit, not feeling like damaged goods. 

My second thought was, if 80% of unmarried evangelicals have had premarital sex (compared to 88% of the general population… here’s the link to the study Sarah mentioned), then whatever we’re saying as a church about premarital sex isn't working very well. And it hasn't been working for a long time. 

You can find a number of passages in the Bible on sexual immorality in general. Leviticus and Deuteronomy include laws regarding sexual relations. Paul’s letters (as well as those letters written in Paul’s name) include references to sexual immorality, often in a list with other sins. Jesus said we are guilty of sin if we so much as lust after another (Matthew 5:27-30).

But there’s no specific prohibition against sex between an unmarried couple.  Sometimes the case is made by coupling the passages against sexual immorality with this quote from Jesus from his teaching on divorce (Matthew 19:1-12): 
“Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
That passage has also been used to argue, among other things, that the sole purpose of sex is for procreation. 

Sometimes Paul’s less-than-enthusiastic endorsement of marriage has been used:
“To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain unmarried as I am. But if they are not practicing self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion.” (1 Corinthians 7:8-9)

There are plenty of opinions on what’s wrong: Some folks say we’ve allowed our kids (and ourselves) to be influenced by the world. Some say that the difference in age between the onset of puberty and marriage has widened since biblical times so that, today, we have much more time to be tempted. Some say that the scripture passages on purity and sex outside of marriage are based on a society in which women and children were seen as property and, therefore, those passages don’t apply today. 

Maybe we’re focusing on the wrong issue. We wave the Bible and spout rules against doing this or that and believe that’s all that needs to be done. Don’t have sex before marriage. Save yourself for your spouse. 

There’s a parable by Jesus I’ve come to appreciate:
“When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it wanders through waterless regions looking for a resting place, but it finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ When it comes, it finds it empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings along seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and live there; and the last state of that person is worse than the first. So will it be also with this evil generation.” (Matt. 12:43-45)

Christianity is more than rules for living. If all we offer is a list of rules and behaviors to avoid, then we’re no better than the Pharisees and have done nothing to nourish the soul. Following Jesus is about relationships, not rules. It’s about loving God and loving each other as genuine human beings. The love of God and of others will fill the emptiness and crowd out evil.

Here’s what has been evolving in my mind as I find ways to talk to my sons about sex: The issue isn’t about sex. It’s about valuing each other as individuals, as people loved by God, flaws and all. It’s about seeing past the physical attractions that get in the way of caring for the other as a person and not as someone to use (a dangerous idea that, at its worst, can lead to sexual abuse). Maybe the emphasis needs to be on how we treat each other as God’s loved ones – relationship! – and not on preserving virginity as a gift, which still has a vestige of viewing sex and our bodies as objects. Let’s build from there.

What do you think? Am I oversimplifying things? Admittedly, there are more practical aspects to flesh out. Am I missing something? 

Here are some additional questions to ponder from Christian Piatt’s Banned Questions about the Bible:
Can you think of any healthy models of sexual expression in the Bible?
Do you think that sexual thoughts are as important as acting on them?
Can Christians advocate an alternate view (besides “prudish Victorianism” or “gratuitous hedonism”) based on the whole witness of scripture?

17 comments:

  1. Thank you for sharing this. I have often felt that as a woman, our culture instills a sense of shame in us for having sex before marriage - but then expects us to suddenly feel as if sex is ok after marriage. That ends up as a very difficult transition emotionally. I teach my children facts and ask them to choose wisely. I tell them that I will love them no matter what and that God will love them always. I teach my children that it is safe to talk to me about anything - and not to feel afraid or ashamed to talk to me about important decisions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You inspired a couple of thoughts:

      First, I think we have to acknowledge that, as a society, we allow a double standard about sex before marriage. Most males not only are not exactly subjected to the same standards regarding sex before marriage (and the baggage of shame and guilt that goes with it), but are often mocked for doing so (see Tim Tebow).

      Second, I think your approach of telling your children that they are loved no matter what - by you and by God - is a message we should strive to get out to our kids as often as possible.

      Delete
  2. Hmmmm. I always thought that the Bible condemned intimacy outside marriage. Marcia Ford in Piatt’s book seems to think so, too. Anyway, I’ve always thought the commandments and the rest of the morals in the Bible were there to help us live together and to be in a relationship with God – kind of a practical guide to how to be happy. I think that the reason God gave them to us is that He loves us and wants us to be happy.

    The practical side of abstinence is the freedom from STDs, especially true in modern times. If I were the father of teenagers today (teenagers make me understand why some animals eat their young), that’s what would scare me the most.

    Finally, if you are married, having a relationship outside marriage is absolutely ruinous, and the Bible clearly steers us away from that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let me know if you find anything in the Bible about premarital relations, Dave. I expected to see more and was surprised that I didn't find anything specifically prohibiting premarital sex. There are a number of laws on adultery and various sexual relations but nothing specifically applied to premarital sex. Of course, the generic terms Paul uses for sexual immorality might have been intended to cover that.

      I agree that God provided the commandments both to set God's followers apart as holy and to help us live in relationship together.

      The more I read in the Bible and try to live out being a disciple of Jesus, the more I appreciate the way Jesus distilled all those laws down to two commandments [an unintentional plug for the upcoming Lent study]. Framing what it means to be in relationship with God and each other in terms of love removes the baggage of obligation and works (as opposed to grace and faith) as well as the shame and guilt that often gets piled on.

      Delete
  3. I’m still looking for that specific prohibition in the Bible against pre-marital relations. Then that started me thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as they get older. Finally, it dawned on me. They were cramming for their finals! As for me, I'm just hoping God grades on the curve.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tim Keller’s answer is that yes, intimacy before marriage is wrong. His explanation is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcjgzCw0zOE.

    Also, New Apologia, a Catholic website, says “The English word for sex before marriage is: ‘fornication.’ Considering this, many point out that several Bible translations never uses the word ‘fornication.’ The reason for this is simply there is no Greek or Hebrew word that specifically and only means: 'sex before marriage'." Despite that, they also conclude that premarital sex is a sin. See their full explanation at http://newapologia.com/premarital-sex-sin/.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems that leads us back to other questions raised (at least in my head) from Sarah Bessey's post: Does that lead us down the path where those who have engaged in premarital sex (the vast majority, it seems) are supposed to feel like "damaged goods"? Is saying "premarital sex is a sin" even effective? [see comments on how many Christians engage in it even though it's wrong]

      While I agree there are good reasons for not engaging in premarital sex (particularly if my teenage boys are reading this)and the consequences can be hard, I still wonder if "Don't do it, it's a sin" is the best way of communicating it.

      That's why I prefer to approach it from a different angle: If we are trying to love God (with all we have) and are trying to love each other as we love ourselves (and as God loves us), then let's do our best to see each other as loved human beings and not as objects of sexual desire. And, if we (or the other person or any person) make a mistake, let's remember that God's love doesn't go away and neither should ours.

      We can help each other work through our mistakes (or our sins, if you prefer) and grow from them without feeling like damaged goods. Not always easy to do in practice, but I believe it's more effective than shame and guilt.

      Delete
  5. I’m having a hard time understanding what the big deal is with being “damaged goods”. We’re all damaged goods, and for many reasons. That’s why Christ died on the cross for us. Accept it, move out and draw fire. Go forth and do good things for the glory of God and be joyful about it!

    I believe Bessey’s real issue was that she couldn’t forgive herself, although I liked the way she eventually resolved it in her article.

    I think you’ve got a pretty good approach to this whole issue with your boys. I’m not sure that the whole abstinence approach is all that effective in the end, but am equally sure that ignoring it is the wrong thing, too. Emphasizing the sanctity of the act and strongly discouraging serial experiences isn’t a bad idea, either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My concern comes in the delivery of the message. Yes, it appears that Sarah Bessey resolved her conflict, but I know a number of folks who only heard the message wrapped in guilt and shame (and, too often, delivered with human condescendence)and never got the news about forgiveness and grace. I know people who say they'll never set foot in a church again because their perception of Christians is that we're much better at telling people what's wrong with them than with telling them they're loved.

      Maybe some of that comes from the filter through which people process what they hear. But at least some of it comes from the way the message is delivered in the first place. If we lead off saying "here's what's wrong with you" or even "we're all sinners", how many people tune out before we get to the good news?

      Maybe I'm looking at things through my own filter, but it seems to me that Jesus engaged those the church establishment of his day looked down on as sinners in a way that made them feel loved and worthy, not flawed and damaged. I'd like to think that we could do a lot better following Jesus' lead here.

      Delete
    2. Of course, I don't mean to paint all churches or all Christians in one broad brush. While I remember being told I was going to hell for this reason or that (perhaps with the intent of following up with Jesus dying for my sin, although I rarely remember hearing that part), I also know many who made me feel loved and welcomed even when I figured I was of questionable character (as recently as now, as a matter of fact).

      Delete
  6. Nelson, thanks for sharing this and the interesting article. Having gone to a Christian college, I saw first-hand the pressures on people not to have sex until marriage. (This led in many cases to students getting engaged after only a short time of dating.)

    I think a huge issue related to this shame is forgiveness. If a person feels that what they have done in the past is wrong and they are continually told that, they, like Dave said, may have a hard time forgiving themselves. This baggage is what they might bring into a marriage as a Christian.

    When I talk to youth about this issue, I like to say that it's not that God is trying to keep us from doing something fun. It's that he knows what is best for us. He knows that if we do have sex before marriage, it can lead to a lot of bad things--pregnancy, STD's, pain, shame, etc... So we wants to protect us from that hurt and therefore has given us the guideline. I'd say that is similar to many commands in the Bible--he knows that if we lie or steal, those things will have real-life consequences for us, and he wants to protect us. God's our parent just as our parents are--they want to protect us and want what's best for us.

    Nelson, I like the way you are going about re-framing your thoughts on the issue. Helping others in relationship instead of objectifying. Maybe with youth, we should spend more time talking about what relationships should be like in general, not just commanding them not to have sex. Good points.

    Alisa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alisa - I just read another post (seems like that original article has inspired quite an impromptu pontification-on-sex-and-purity-fest) that you might find interesting:
      http://krwordgazer.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-purity-conversation-my-two-cents.html

      The author describes her experience remaining pure as a part of Marantha Christian Ministries. Her perspective is that, while society objectifies women through revealing clothing and a loose sexual ethic, Christians can also engage in a reverse objectification with a preoccupation on sexual purity and virginity.

      She wrote: "It's good to wait until marriage, if we do it because we're walking in the Spirit. But walking in condemnation because we didn't wait-- that's also of the flesh.
      "And reducing women to objects of the flesh in the name of purity?
      "As far as I can see, that is the most fleshly of all. "

      Delete
  7. Wow! That purity and courtship movement thing comes as a shock! Makes me really, really, really glad that I’m Presbyterian! I sincerely hope that it’s just a fringe movement. It sounds like in Wordgazer’s case, she’s effectively dealt with it and her life’s turned out pretty well.

    The one positive aspect I saw in it though, is the emphasis (actually in their case it seems to be an ironclad rule), that you had to marry someone from within the church. That’s where my parents found each other and they were married for 58 loving years until my Dad died. That’s also where my little sister found her wonderful husband of over 20 years; they have two great kids, now young adults, as well. While marrying within the church is certainly not a guarantee of a great marriage, and it is certainly not the only way to have a great marriage, from my foxhole it looks like it works pretty well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll play the exception to the rule (which isn't so much a rule, as you noted that there are other ways to have a great marriage). When Natalie and I got married, she was going to church but I wasn't. It's probably a good bet that, if she had decided not to marry me because I wasn't in church at the time, I would never have ended up at Grace. While, at the time, I wasn't adverse to church, I'm not sure if I would have recognized that the thing that was missing in my life was being part of a faith community. So I'm glad she took the chance.

      Delete
  8. I’m glad Natalie took a chance, too, Nelson. I didn’t mean to endorse marrying within the church as an ironclad rule, just to observe that it seems to turn out pretty well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, Dave. And who knows how things would have turned out if I had been more adverse/hostile toward church?

      Delete
  9. Sex Bible verses are bit taboo, but who isn't interested about sexual relations in ancient times?

    www.holy-bibles.org/search5/sex.htm

    ReplyDelete