Saturday, February 16, 2013

Was I predestined to have doubts about predestination?


Predestination is one of those Calvin things I’ve never fully grasped or been comfortable with (yeah, I know, that could be the point of it). In fact, when I first returned to church, I wondered if I could even become a Presbyterian if I didn’t buy into predestination. I still wonder that. 

If you’re not familiar with it, here’s a description of what Presbyterians believe about predestination (my emphasis added):

Calvin defines predestination as "God's eternal decree, by which he compacted with himself what he willed to become of each [person]. For ... eternal life is foreordained for some, eternal damnation for others." So predestination is an act of God's will through which God elects or chooses those whom God calls to faith and thus to eternal life, and through which God chooses those who will not receive faith.

There’s a Biblical basis behind Calvin’s interpretation – Romans 9-11 – but, like a lot of Paul’s writings, it’s not so simple. Paul, making a case that we are called by God’s actions and not our efforts, says things like:

So then he [God] has mercy on whomever he chooses, and he hardens the heart of whomever he chooses. [Romans 9:18]
For God has imprisoned all in disobedience so that he may be merciful to all. [Romans 11:32]

Is that a rationale for exclusion or inclusion? Is the intent to condemn or to be merciful? Does that mean we don’t have free will after all?

The church has wrestled with the concept of election and predestination since, well, at least since the time the early church realized the gospel had been opened to Gentiles as well as Jews in Acts. According to What do Presbyterians believe about predestination?, theologians like Augustine, Luther (yes, him, too) and Calvin saw predestination as an essential component of justification by grace alone (as opposed to works). Later Calvinists put more emphasis on it than Calvin himself did (so maybe it wasn’t all Calvin’s doing). 

A couple of recent posts, coming from an evangelical perspective, highlight some of the questions many people still have about the implications of predestination.

Ed Cyzewski, in Did God Do That?, asked

Once you start believing in a God who predestines the course of your life, sin becomes a really big problem. Did God want me to sin? Did God harden my heart like Pharaoh so that he could teach others about the perils of sin?

If we assume that God has already chosen who is saved and who isn’t, or that God uses the disobedience of some to show God’s mercy, are we really responsible for our sins? Or did we sin because God willed it?

Zach Hunt (Let’s Talk About Predestination) carried this further:

If God has already chosen who will go to heaven, what is the point of evangelism and/or missionary work?

He sees a conflict between predestination and Jesus’ great commission. If God has already determined who is saved and who isn’t (I’ll leave the question about what it means to be “saved” for another day), then why would Jesus tell his disciples to go and make disciples of all nations?. 

I’ll add another “problem” to the mix: I’ve heard some Christians use the doctrine of predestination to write off whole groups or races of people by saying, “They’re not part of God’s elect.” Unfortunately, some have used this as justification for dismissing concerns about justice or injustice in some parts of the world (Palestinian refugees in the Middle East, for example). I have trouble resolving that mind set with Jesus’ gospel as I understand it. 

If you have a chance, read Zach Hunt’s questions. I’ve only read some of the responses but found one by Ben Irwin to be particularly interesting (my emphasis added):

No one individual and/or group of people is ever chosen as an end unto itself. People in the Bible are chosen/predestined/elected for the benefit of others...i.e. the "outsiders." Abraham is "elected" to become a blessing to all nations on earth. Israel is "elected" to serve as priest to the nations, pointing the way to God. Even if salvation starts with the election of some, it never, ever stops there. It's just the beginning.

I have more questions than answers about predestination and I’m not sure it means what many say it means. What do you think?

Does predestination mean that, even if we have free will, we ultimately don’t? Are our sins the result of our choices or God’s will?

Does predestination mean that we shouldn’t worry about who receives the gospel and who doesn’t?

How do we explain both predestination and free will?

6 comments:

  1. This gets into an area that I've been doing a lot of reading and thinking about. First there was Rob Bell's book, "Love Wins." And then there was Tom Talbott's "The Inescapable Love of God." Through them, I was introduced to the concept of Christian Universalism. Seems like Zach Hunt's comment is in line with Christian Universalism.

    Talbott is an evangelical theologian/philosopher at Willamette University. He does a terrific job of comparing the universalist perspective to the Augustinian/Calvinist and Arminian positions. He identifies 3 propositions which in my succinct rendering are:
    1. God desires/wills to be in redemptive relationship with all persons.
    2. In His omnipotence, God has the power to make this happen.
    3. Some people thwart/resist God's will and power and reject God's offer of redemption. God then sends them to a place of eternal torment forever or annihilates them altogether.

    Talbott asserts that these 3 propositions cannot all be true. (Interestingly, he snows apparent Biblical justification for each proposition, but that's for another blog.) He then shows how the different combinations of 2 of the propositions represent the respective Augustinian/Calvinist, Arminian, and Universalist perspectives.

    The Augusitian/Calvinist positions asserts that of the 3 propositions, #2 and #3 are true. The emphasis here is on God's sovereignty and omnipotence. The Arminians say #1 and #3 are true which effectively says human free will can indeed thwart God's will. And Universalists say #1 and #2 are true. God has the power to achieve his redemptive will and purpose.

    Enough said for now. I personally am attracted to the Universalist perspective. My thinking has certainly raised the question, "What is the Augustinian/Calvinist/Reformed/Presbyterian position nowadays?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. To me, logically, free will is a prerequisite for loving God – it’s not love if it forced or predestined in any way. How could God’s greatest commandment to us be to love him with all our heart, soul, and mind then?

    I don’t see any way that predestination and free will can exist together.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I'm not sure how predestination - at least in the aspect that God determines who sins - can exist with free will. Maybe, as I've heard some try to explain "predestination" as God's "foreknowing", it means that because God exists outside of time, God already knows how we will respond. I don't know. But I don't think it means that God controls our actions.

      Delete
  3. Here's something I just came across that, at least to me, challenges us to consider what God is doing in the world beyond Judaism and Christianity. I was listening to an interview where Old Testament scholar Walter Brueggamann was asked what text he would use to address the topic of religious pluralism. He immediately said Amos 9:7.
    "Are you not like the Ethiopians [Nubians, Cushites] to me,
    O people of Israel? says the Lord.
    Did I not bring Israel up from the land of Egypt,
    and the Philistines from Caphtor and the Arameans from Kir?"

    Brueggamann said that this passage not only indicates that God had an Exodus relationship with other peoples, but that the Philistines (Palestinians) and Arameans (Syrians) also happened to be Israel's enemies then and now. He says that this shows that the God of exodus/liberation/transformation is at work among all peoples (not to mention different religions).

    Maybe being "elected" as God's people isn't as exclusive as we try to make it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe. Or maybe God brought the others up so He could demonstrate His supremacy to the other nations through His favoring His only chosen people, Israel. Brueggamann’s evidence to support his assertion seems a bit thin, but I’d like to see more.

      Delete
    2. Just to make sure that folks don't associate today's Palestinians only with Biblical Philistines, it is important to note their ancestoral linkage to Canaanites (after Noah's grandson, Canaan). I'm not sure, but this understanding seems to align with the contemporary division of Palestinian territory into West Bank/Canaan and Gaza/Philistia.

      Delete