Saturday, April 27, 2013

The opposite of faith is… doubt… or certainty?


What makes our faith strong? Can you have faith and still have doubts?

Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. [Hebrews 11:1]
 Jesus said, “Come.” So Peter got out of the boat, started walking on the water, and came toward Jesus. But when he noticed the strong wind, he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, “Lord, save me!” Jesus immediately reached out his hand and caught him, saying to him, “You of little faith, why did you doubt?” [Matthew 14:29-31]

While the author of Hebrews uses “assurance” and “conviction” when describing faith, many more passages in the Bible suggest that even the most faithful of those called by God stepped out more tentatively than boldly and struggled with doubt just as Peter did. Abraham left his homeland to follow God, but he still struggled with God’s promise for an offspring because he and Sarah were so old. Jacob feared encountering Esau after so many years because he worried more about whether Esau held a grudge than about whether God had also blessed Esau. Moses made excuses to try to get out of leading the Israelites out of Egypt. The history of Israel in the Old Testament is filled with times of humility that often followed missteps and misplaced faith in things other than God. 

Even in the Gospels, the disciples struggled to understand the assurance and conviction that called them to Jesus. Their struggle to understand who Jesus was came not so much from a lack of faith but from a certainty that the messiah must be something that was much different than what Jesus was. When Jesus called his disciples, he didn't hand them a scroll filled with requirements for discipleship. He helped them wrestle with their questions, often using questions and parables that challenged what they thought they knew. 

Maybe the thing that holds us back isn't doubt but certainty – in particular, an insistence on holding on to our particular concepts with a stubborn conviction that dismisses the idea that we may not have everything right. Chaplain Mike at Internet Monk recently wrote about Mistakes We Make about Faith:

We mistakenly understand faith when we…
Confuse having faith with having certainty….
Fail to recognize how much our fears shape our faith.
Think that having a hearty or mature faith means I have strong opinions about lots of different issues.
Trust in our faith rather than in the One who is the object of our faith….
Imagine that having faith will give us “answers” to life’s perplexing questions.
Forget that Jesus helped the one who said, “I believe; help my unbelief.”
Fail to recognize how much our personalities, experiences, and relationships affect the way we think about faith and exercise it….
Think that faith is only an individual thing and that I cannot ever be carried by the faith of others….
Presume that faith can only grow in religious soil, through influences that are specifically pious or devotional in nature.

Doubt is often equated with losing faith, perhaps wrongly so. Scot McKnight, reviewing a book called The Skeptical Believer by Daniel Taylor, suggests that doubt may be an element of faith

The Skeptical Believer. No, it’s not a contradiction in terms. It’s a simple, everyday reality for many people of faith….  Doubt happens to faith and to believers, not so much to unbelievers. It’s struggling with faith and in the midst of faith, not denying faith. It’s seeking to make sense of faith…. Doubt is misgivings about truth claims, in this case about Christian truth claims. 

Doubt may not be a sign that we don’t believe in God, but that we are struggling with someone else’s claims about God, or with our current concept of God. Doubt may mean that we care enough about our faith to wrestle with it. In examining what we believe and stripping away the fluff from the heart, we can come away with a better understanding of God and a stronger faith. 

Samantha Field, who writes about surviving spiritual abuse on her blog Defeating the Dragons, describes the dangers of not asking questions in an interview on the her.meneutics blog.

[Spiritual abuse] also happens when people stop asking why. Being handed a list of “this is what you should believe” is so very easy, especially when that list is handed to you by someone you respect. But when we stop asking questions, when we even begin to accept that asking questions is in itself a problem, that's when we can surrender our faith into the hands of someone who could misuse it.
…We seem to confuse "having faith" with "being certain." I'm no longer comfortable with feeling certain about anything; certainty, I've found, is dangerous territory. It also bothers me when we frequently resort to statements like "the Bible is very clear on this issue," or that a specific interpretation of a passage is "plain" or "obvious." This type of language seems almost designed to shut down conversation, or to dismiss the speaker's opposition.
I think it's important for us to stay receptive to new and challenging ideas. To honestly engage with a concept we don't agree with, and see where it takes us. Instead of digging in even deeper when our faith system gets confronted, if we took a second to empathetically understand their perspective, we could have a change of heart and a change of mind.

I know people who mistake their understanding about God or Jesus or their denomination’s declarations for the word of God. They make emphatic proclamations and, when challenged, say, “You’re disagreeing with God.” Samantha Field is right – that becomes a conversation stopper. It often reflects more about the person making the statements than it does about God, and it stifles more than it illuminates. 

Do you agree with the writers mentioned above that we confuse faith with certainty? Does faith guarantee certainty or does certainty undermine faith? Is there room for doubt in a strong faith? Can you have a strong, vibrant faith without wrestling with doubt? Which do you think is more dangerous to our faith – doubt, complacency, or certainty? 

6 comments:

  1. As humans we have a genetic claim for doubt and fear, but our faith in Jesus Christ helps us overcome these doubts and fears. I think it is good to disagree with God and the Bible because that means that we are engaged and thinking about it. I believe the greatest challenge to our faith is complacency. We go to church every Sunday and go home for the rest of the week not giving much thought to God. We believe we show our faith through these actions, in reality we are playing right into the devils' hands by being complacent with our faith and not giving enough to God. We should let God into our lives on a daily basis. I am a long way from getting it right, but it is important to try every day. Just a few thoughts for today!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I concur with Joe. If the opposite of love is not hatred, but apathy and complacency is a form of apathy; and the thing that God wants most from us is a relationship; then that would make complacency the thing that God wants the least from us. How can you truly love God without an ongoing personal conversation, one that ultimately leads you closer to Him?

    If it is supposed to be so clear, then why isn’t the Bible so simple? Why does it have apparent contradictions? Why aren’t all the gospels synoptic?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that complacency is more detrimental to faith than doubt. But what about certainty? I'm not talking so much about a confident faith that, through it all, God is and will be there. Instead, I'm referring to the kind of certainty that denies questions and doubts, that can become more of a crutch than a help... and, in some cases, can take the place of God.

    There's a point where certainty holds some back from growing in faith. In the face of questions and doubt, faith in God will allow you to step out and examine those questions and doubts with confidence that God will lead you to a deeper meaning. Someone who is over-reliant on their certainty may not make that step either because they believe they already know everything there is about God or they fear the unknown.

    In Samantha Field's case, the veneer of certainty (and I realize "certainty" may not be the right term here) was used by others of a way of controlling her in a manner that is far from Christ-like. There are a lot of stories like hers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Speaking of certainty, yesterday, I ran across this piece from William Lane Craig on uncertainty and religious toleration:

    Founding religious toleration on uncertainty about the truth of one’s own religious convictions is multiply flawed. It naively supposes that the sources of religious intolerance are primarily intellectual rather than social. It presupposes gratuitously that all religions are on an epistemic par. It fails to take account of the fact that some religions abet religious tolerance. Finally, the proposal is self-defeating because insofar as it presupposes the objectivity of certain moral principles, it actually supplies a defeater of major religious traditions.

    Read more: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/is-uncertainty-a-sound-foundation-for-religious-tolerance#ixzz2S8VoHk1D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uncertainty may not be a sound foundation for religious tolerance, but humility sure is (which is the title of the book this article is from). I agree with Craig that founding religious tolerance on uncertainty is "frightenly dangerous." I think that, sometimes, blind faith becomes a false certainty that masks a fear of not being completely certain in one's belief. When that belief is challenged, a number of things can happen (depending on the person):
      (1) It can lead to some soul-searching and wrestling with what we belief and, possibly, to a new epiphany that leads to a deeper understanding
      (2) The person can discount it because it doesn't fit their pre-existing world view
      (3) The person can view the conflicting information as a threat and the one who offers that conflicting information as an enemy

      I think it takes a bit of faith to take the first approach, trusting that, in that wrestling, God is there (perhaps like Jacob who wrestled with the Lord before meeting Esau or Paul after being struck blind on the road to Damascus). But there are fundamental extremes of different religions that take the third approach that can lead to dangerous tensions.

      Is it possible to be tolerant of other religious traditions without compromising our own? That's where humility come in. Just because we have a firm foundation in our faith doesn't mean we know all there is to know. The Bible offers accounts of where God worked through other people/nations when God's own people weren't listening (or had strayed). It's quite possible (likely?) that God may continue that practice today.

      Three of the major religions in the world - Judaism, Christianity, and Islam - all descended from Abraham. God's promise to Abraham was that his descendants would become a blessing to all nations. Faith AND humility together might lead us to be open to the possibility that we alone haven't cornered the market on being that blessing to others. And I don't think we have to abandon our faith to believe that. [Maybe I've diverged from the original point.]

      Delete
  5. The opposite of faith is curiosity.

    ReplyDelete