What does the Bible say about homosexuality, gay marriage, and ordination of gay ministers? These questions often get strong reactions. Where you stand on this issue likely depends on how you approach the Bible and your faith and how that relates to the way you live your life. But it also depends on cultural views, your understanding of sexual orientation, and your position on a number of other political and ideological issues. It’s hard for us to separate our cultural/world view from our approach to faith.
If you search the Bible, you’ll find far fewer passages about homosexual behavior than you will for things like idolatry, pride, greed, justice, or hypocrisy. That’s not to diminish it, but to note that it is not a major theme in the Bible. Let’s take a look at those passages. You can find a compilation of those references at Christian Bible Reference.
First, let’s be clear: You won’t find a Hebrew or Greek term for “homosexuality” in the scriptures. There was also no understanding of sexual orientation as we understand it today. The scripture passages address homosexual acts, but not orientation or relationships.
The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19) is often cited as God’s punishment against widespread homosexuality in those cities. But is their offense homosexuality or rape? Ezekiel described the sins of Sodom: they were “arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. They were haughty and did detestable things before me.” (Ezekiel 16:49-50). Read on and you’ll see that God also promised to restore the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters, returning them to what they were before (16:53-55). A similar passage in Isaiah includes no reference to homosexual behavior (Isaiah 1:10-17).
Is homosexuality the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, or is Genesis 19 an illustration of the extent of their arrogance, gluttony, pride, and lack of concern for others?
The Holiness Code in Leviticus includes two references to homosexual acts:
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination" (Lev. 18:22) and
"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death; their blood is upon them" (Lev. 20:13).
That’s pretty straightforward. Sex between two men is an abomination punishable by death. Many arguments against homosexuality often emphasize the “abomination” part. I was surprised at how often “abomination” appears in the Bible. It occurs in 110 verses in the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible (142 times in the King James Version and 115 times in the Amplified Bible; the NIV uses the word “detestable” instead). Abomination is used to describe everything from improper sacrifices to unclean foods to idolatry and not keeping God’s statutes and ordinances. The bottom line is that it’s not a term reserved for a certain kind of sin: pretty much any sin is considered an abomination.
As for sins punishable by death, that list includes murder, cursing a parent, kidnapping, witchcraft and sorcery, sex with an animal, working on the Sabbath, incest, adultery, blasphemy, false prophecy, and false claim of a woman's virginity.
Three passages in the New Testament refer to homosexual acts, including the only reference to sex between two women. In his letter to the Romans, Paul wrote that, because the wicked refused to honor God and worshipped idols, “God gave them over to shameful lusts”, unnatural sexual relations, and same-sex acts (1:24-27), as well as envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice, gossip, slander, God-hating, insolence, arrogance, disobedience to parents, and lack of fidelity, love, and mercy (1:29-31). Some, including several responding to the question in Banned Questions About the Bible (p. 23-28), say that Paul was addressing ritual pagan worship behaviors rather than same-sex relationships.
In 1 Corinthians, Paul writes that idolaters, adulterers, men who have sex with men, cheats (swindlers and thieves), the greedy, drunkards, revilers, slanderers, extortioners, and robbers will not inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor 6:9-10)… at least not without the grace offered through Jesus (6:11). There’s a similar statement in 1 Timothy. In both passages, Paul refers to those who engage in homosexual acts with a Greek word (arsenokoitai) that has a range of interpretations. Beyond interpretation issues, Paul doesn’t single out those acts, but includes it in a longer list of sins.
Here’s what Jesus said about homosexuality in the Gospels:
There’s nothing there. Jesus says he came to fulfill all of the laws, not do away with them (Matthew 5:17-20). There’s a whole other post sometime down the line on what that means in light of Jesus’s ministry. But, in the same sermon, he also warns us against judging others and tells us to take the log out of our own eyes before we try to take the speck out of someone else’s eye (Matthew 7:1-5). At the least, this should challenge anyone who calls homosexuality an abomination while ignoring their own abominable sins.
Jesus focuses on restoring our relationship with God – loving God with everything we have and loving our neighbors as ourselves. He said that all of the laws and prophets are built on those two commandments.
Those are the passages that specifically address homosexual acts. Some argue with great conviction that the Bible explicitly condemns homosexuality while others say it’s not as clear cut as it seems. What do you think?
In a follow-up post, I want to explore the question “Do the Biblical laws on homosexual behavior still apply today?”, but for now I’d like to focus on these passages. Do you think they warrant the amount of emphasis some Christian groups place on them today? Do you see room for the arguments other groups make that, taken in context, they may not address monogamous same-sex relationships?
I look forward to your comments. As always, let’s be mindful that, as Christians, we are called to be known by our love. This particular topic is one in which many folks outside the church too often get a very different view of Christians: one of intolerance and hate. I will be watching closely to make sure we continue to keep this blog a safe place for people to share their thoughts and questions.
Hi Nelson.
ReplyDeleteI think you have done a masterful job of laying out the issues. Thank you.
I have a couple of comments.
First, I think it is very important to pay attention to the fact that Jesus does not directly address homosexuality. Since he addresses many other "sins" at some length, including divorce and adultery, it suggests that homosexuality was not of great concern to him. If we are to look to Jesus as our authority, (and I think we are) this suggests perhaps we need worry less about the "immorality" of people living in same-sex relationships. Perhaps some Christian circles are making too much of an issue of this.
Which leads me to my second comment. Perhaps we need to consider that it is our discomfort with same-sex relationships that drives our need to find them "immoral" rather than the other way around. People are often uncomfortable with what they don't experience and don't understand. Perhaps that's something we need to recognize.
The underlying concern in same-sex and heterosexual relationships is whether or not there is love. Are we being inconsistent in the way we judge same-sex and heterosexual relationships? We don't condemn divorce or adultery nearly as vehemently as we do homosexuality, though Jesus gave far more attention to those and was quite clear about what he thought. Is it because we have more experience with adultery and divorce, and are therefore more understanding and less condemning? It is hard for me to imagine that there can be a place of love where God is not present. God is love, and where God is, love is, and where love is, God is. But I can imagine a "Christian" place where God's presence is diminished because love is missing. Kathy
Kathy,
DeleteThanks for offering a lot of food for thought. I have a lot of thoughts bouncing about in my head from it, but want to offer one observation triggered by your comments:
I suspect we can end up with very different views about how much emphasis the Bible places on homosexual behaviors (or any other behavior, for that matter) depending on how we read the Bible. If we only look up passages related specifically to homosexuality, words like "abomination" and "they shall be put to death" jump out as pretty harsh pronouncements. However, if we try to consider the context (which is what I hoped to do above), then there's more context that should at least cause us to consider the passages in a broader context of the intent. And, if we read the entire Bible, we'll likely notice that the Bible doesn't make as big an issue over homosexual behaviors as some make it out to be.
In fact, I would argue that the major emphasis of the Bible is on our relationship with God and the love and grace of God. As you noted, if we take Jesus as our authority, homosexuality isn't an issue. Love for God and through God is.
I want to follow up on a couple of other things Kathy said in her comment: that we, as followers of Christ, should look to Jesus as our authority and that the underlying concern should be whether there is love. While comfort/ discomfort is a factor, I've noticed that many people of faith are focusing on whether there is a Biblical basis either in favor or against a monogamous, same-sex relationship. This post looked at the scripture passages most often used against such a relationship. I'm planning a follow-up post that will look at some passages that might offer room in support of such a relationship, although I think Kathy offered a great one: God is love and where God is, love is (and visa versa). The first letter of John develops that well.
ReplyDeleteI read a post on the Jesus Creed blog reporting that a conservative evangelical leader in Britain just announced that he will encourage churches to support same-sex partnerships (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2013/01/15/same-sex-relationships-and-steve-chalke/). Here is his reasoning (from the post):
"'I did this... to extend to these people what I would do to others – the love and support of our local church. Too often, those who seek to enter an exclusive, same-sex relationship have found themselves stigmatised and excluded by the Church. I have come to believe this is an injustice and out of step with God’s character as seen through Christ.'"
The love we look for is not only in the relationship but in how we respond.
I started this hoping to find that homosexuality was really OK by the Bible. And pretty much, I think it is. It certainly seems much less an issue than it is made out to be. However, “pretty much” doesn’t mean that it’s OK – at the end of the day, it’s either right or wrong. The only passage I have a hard time getting around is Timothy 1:8-11; I found none of the arguments in Piatt’s book or anywhere else to clearly refute it. The only way I got around that one is to go to the Amplified Bible and its “better” translation of what’s usually written as “homosexual”. It instead translates the Greek as “those who abuse themselves with men” (Odd that it doesn’t say anything about women, but who knows why?). It would then seem that an exclusive, loving homosexual relationship that would be free of abuse would therefore be OK. Although I can’t even begin to understand the technical arguments over translation, I also found the argument for the translation of “eunuch” in Piatt’s book to be fascinating.
ReplyDeleteAnother thing that really struck me was the piece from the Christian Bible Reference website comparing the mentions of “homosexual acts” to things like “greed”, “adultery”, etc. and that “self righteousness” was only outranked by “idolatry”. If you take those mentions as a measure of the gravity of each of those sins (an imperfect measure), then the current debate over gay marriage and homosexuality in general is way off base. It seems to me that those on both sides who condemn those on the other side of the debate are clearly committing a sin. They need to remove that plank from their eye.
Once again Nelson, thanks for a great job.
You made some good points, Dave. I'm working on a follow-up to this that explores some of the passages that start looking at the bigger picture in relation to Jesus' ministry, and the passage on the eunuchs is on that list.
DeleteI've found a few references to the terms used in 1 Timothy (as well as in 1 Corinthians) to refer to commit homosexual acts. One is often translated as "male prostitute" but also means "a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man." The other refers to a person who engages in homosexual acts or, as you found in the Amplified Bible, "abuse themselves with men." It refers more to prostitution than to a relationship.
As you said, there's nothing that comes straight out and says, "It's okay," so we're left to wrestle with it (as God leaves us to do with a number of things).
One alibi on self-righteousness: If everyone were Presbyterian, they wouldn’t have this problem and we wouldn’t be having this debate on homosexuality or anything else for that matter. Why can’t all other churches, synagogues, mosques, etc, become Presbyterian, the one true religion?
ReplyDelete