I recently came across a speech Francis Su, a mathematics professor from Harvey Mudd College, gave after receiving a prestigious teaching award. He used his acceptance speech to talk about how the lesson of grace has helped him as a teacher:
“Your accomplishments are NOT what make you a worthy human being.You learn this lesson when someone shows you GRACE: good things you didn't earn or deserve, but you're getting them anyway.I have to learn this lesson over and over again. You can have worthiness apart from your performance. You can have dignity independent of achievements. Your identity does not have to be rooted in accomplishments. You can be loved for who you are, not for what you’ve done---somebody just has to show you grace.”
Here’s the link to The Lesson of Grace in Teaching. It’s a little long, but worth reading. When I had to talk to my oldest son this week about his school challenges, it reminded me that he might need grace more than a lecture on applying himself.
Grace is the foundation of the good news Jesus brought us. Our accomplishments are NOT what make us worthy to God. God loves us for who we are, not what we've done, or even what we will do.
I think most of us want to embrace that in our hearts, but we struggle with the implications in our minds because it’s so counter to today’s culture. We live in a society that measures worthiness by where we live, what we do, how much we earn, and what we accomplished. We embrace the image of the “self-made” person who rose to the top, presumably with no assistance from anyone and no privilege based on birth or circumstances. And we've bought the converse that the poor or needy are that way only because they haven’t put in the effort. “There’s no such thing as a free lunch” is used to justify building barriers between the privileged and the needy.
But that’s not the grace Jesus brings to us. Many of us have problems with the parable of the workers in the vineyard (Matthew 20:1-16). Jesus says the kingdom of heaven is like the landowner who hired workers for his vineyard. He hired some early in the morning, some later in the day, some near the end of the day. Then he paid them all the same wages. When the morning workers grumbled because they were paid the same as those who only worked an hour, the landowner said, “I am not being unfair to you, friend…. I want to give the one who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?”
That’s not the American way. But that’s God’s way.
The late Michael Spencer, known as the Internet Monk, called grace “dangerous stuff.” In Our Problem With Grace, he argues that “the Bible is incomprehensible apart from grace,” which brings “salvation for all people.” The problem many have with this promise of grace is the lack of strings God attaches to it. What’s the motivation for being good if grace is as good as it seems? Why should the workers put in a whole day if the ones who only come at the end of the day get the same reward?
People worried about “cheap grace” try to add a “but…” to grace. Grace, but you have to obey the commandments… but you have to serve in the church… but you have to behave accordingly. Spencer says that’s putting the emphasis in the wrong place. Obedience doesn't create grace. That’s the legalism trap. Instead, our desire to follow God’s commands is a response to grace. Grace points to God, not to us. We may not be perfect – nobody is – but God doesn't give up on us. Spencer writes:
“Grace loves so unconditionally that it will not abandon a person to his own rebellion and waywardness without a fight….Grace doesn't approve [of our outrageous behaviors]. Grace just refuses to give up on us.”
If it’s all about God, where does that leave us? How do we live out this life of grace? I liked the last part of Francis Su's speech, where he acknowledges “Jesus as the ultimate giver and source of grace, endowing all human beings with worth and dignity that they don’t have to earn.” He suggests several ways grace can shape our lives.
- Because grace affirms our dignity, we can affirm the dignity of others by getting to know them by name, spending time with them, and sharing our joy with them.
- Since our performance doesn’t define us, we are free to try things without fear about failing. In fact, we can fail without worrying what others think.
- Because we often learn our most meaningful lessons when we struggle, we can share those lessons with others. We can help affirm the struggles of others, letting them know they’re not alone.
- We can share our weaknesses without fear of what others think because our worthiness is not in our accomplishments… and our worth is not diminished by our failures.
What do you think?
Do you believe grace is as simple as "God loves you based solely on who you are and not what you have done (or not done)"?
Is grace truly unconditional?
Some people practice spiritual disciplines as a way of becoming more obedient and faithful. Michael Spencer said that grace doesn't grow from obedience, but that obedience can grow out of faith. Do you think that’s true? Why or why not?
What are some ways God’s grace has freed you from worrying about what others think?
How do you share that grace with others?
All my thoughts lately about any question seem to return to my readings and discussions on Christian Universalism which, as Michael Spencer says above brings "salvation to all people." In other words, no one ends up in Hell forever.
ReplyDeleteI think one of the barriers to grace is judgmentalism. I have found I have almost autonomous, immediate judgmental thoughts about people based on how they look, what they say, what they do. Kind of like the "older son" in Pastor Erin's message last Sunday on the parable of the prodigal. And so I condemn these folks to a lower place in my mind.
Christian Universalism asserts that all are loved by God and that in the end, all will be reconciled to Him. None are assigned to eternal torment in Hell by God. Neither are any allowed to enter eternal torment in Hell because they refuse to accept God's grace. In the end, Grace Wins! Love Wins! Now that's what I call "Good News."
In learning of this, I've found my spirit (or more likely, the Holy Spirit) catching me in thoughts of judgmentalism and reminding myself of God's inescapable grace and love... which has led me to restate and reframe my initial impression into a more gracious one.
Sometimes I think it's hard enough to grasp that God's love for me does not depend on what I've done (or not done) and that, even if I mess up royally (which happens oh, at least daily), that love is still there. Francis Su talks about the freedom in knowing our worth doesn't depend on our performance. That's what Paul is referring to when he writes about being free from sin and the law in Romans (at least, that's how I interpret it).
DeleteAs hard as it is to accept and live out that grace in our own lives, I think we also struggle with acknowledging that God extends that grace to everyone else as well. Maybe the fortunate thing for all of us is that grace is God's doing and doesn't depend on our judgment.
For everyone we judge as falling short based on what we see or think we know about them, there's probably someone judging us just the same. None of us really know everything God is doing to redeem creation. Thankfully, God's grace doesn't give up on us.
I've been thinking more about Greg's comments on grace/love wins. Different Christians emphasize different aspects of God, Jesus, the gospel, and just about everything else faith-related. Some folks focus on the justice aspect. There's sin because we don't follow God's laws and that sin runs counter to God's holiness. Our sins have consequences and the justice folks expect those consequences (reparation, punishment) to be enforced. The Jewish laws included specific reparations, sacrifices, and punishments for violations of those laws. Our justice system is based on this balance between breaking the law and paying the cost, although it's far from perfect.
ReplyDeleteMany Christians today still believe that, even with the grace offered through Jesus, there will still be consequences for those who don't embrace it they way they believe it should be embraced. Sort of like grace with strings attached.
But that notion doesn't hold up to the parable of the workers I mentioned in this post. Or to the parable of the prodigal son. Or, for that matter, to much of the gospel. Jesus turned a lot of the prevailing notions about God's justice upside down. He moved the emphasis from justice by enforcement to loving God and each other. He freed God's grace from the shackles a few had tried to put on it so that it was open to all.
I think the justice folks are worried that this notion of love trumping all and grace flows freely to all will be taken as a license for "anything goes." But Paul addressed that in his letter to Romans. The question is can there be love without justice? If we're orienting our lives and actions toward loving God and others, I think justice will be a natural outflow of that love. Maybe the questions should be can we have justice without love? I
If we are to truly embrace "God so loved the world that he sent his only son to redeem it", then I think we have to be open to the possibility (likelihood) that God will do whatever it takes to redeem the whole world.
Are there limits to God’s grace, at least on earth? Aren’t natural consequences – a form of justice - limits on God’s grace?
ReplyDeleteI’ve often thought that the ten commandments are God’s gift to us, the purpose of which is to give us some left and right limits so we can avoid being unhappy. But maybe that’s part of God’s grace, too.
That's a good question, Dave. The natural consequences of the younger son in the prodigal parable were that he lost everything he had and resorted to feeding pigs (an animal considered unclean in Jewish law), who ate better than he did.
DeleteHis father forgave and embraced him anyway. Of course, he had to make the decision to return to his father.
Maybe that's grace in a nutshell.
Maybe we need to ask ourselves, "What exactly is justice?" Christian Universalist Tom Talbott in "Inescapable Love of God" makes the case that forgiveness and mercy are inherently just. In the human realm, a ruler can make things right by declaration. Doesn't a Presidential pardon do that? We know that power is lawful as we find it granted in Article II of the Constitution. Of course, people sometimes have trouble accepting pardons, thinking the ruler's decision doesn't seem fair or just. And maybe, that's why we cannot fully understand and accept the implications of Jesus cry from the Cross, "Father, forgive them..."
ReplyDelete